Home › Buffzone Columnists
Woelk: Sunday tilt worthwhile move for CU
Count this corner among the traditionalists who agree with Joe Paterno: college football should be played on Saturday afternoons.
STORY TOOLS
More Buffzone Columnists
- Woelk: Moms are really the ultimate 'go-to guys'
- Woelk: Tuition hike latest obstacle for Buffaloes
- Woelk: After 3 years, CU athletics on solid footing
Share and Enjoy [?]
No other sport has such a storied history associated with a specific day of the week. One could argue that the NFL and Sundays go hand-in-hand, but long before pro football was barely more than a blip, college football teams were making autumn afternoons part of America's culture.
But -- oh, this hurts -- even tradition must once in a while take a back seat to common sense. In a day and age when money and exposure are the engines that run Division I sports, tradition can indeed be trumped.
That's why it's hard to argue with agreements such as the one recently reached by Colorado and Colorado State to move their season opener next fall to Sunday, Aug. 31.
The decision by the two schools is a sound one for a variety of reasons, beginning with the fact that it will give Denver's emergency and security forces an extra day to breathe after the completion of the Democratic National Convention. The convention ends Aug. 28, and will no doubt greatly tax all available city personnel.
Certainly, one more day for them to recover can only help.
But it makes even more sense -- for both schools -- in terms of television exposure, television money and ticket sales.
For starters, there was no guarantee of a television deal for a Saturday game. FSN had shown a casual interest, but with a full schedule of games on the opening day of the college football season, even a televised game would have been only one of as many as 10 televised games that day.The list of televised games that day already includes the Washington-Oregon and Alabama-Clemson contests, and such tilts as Missouri-Illinois, USC-Virginia and Michigan State-Cal are almost certain to be picked up.
Simply, a CU-CSU game would have likely been lost in the national shuffle.
Sunday, however, is a different story. There are currently only two other college football games on Aug. 31 -- Hampton vs. Jackson State at noon and Kentucky vs. Louisville at 1:30 p.m. -- and the NFL doesn't start its regular season until a week later.
Thus, the Buffs and Rams will have the football airwaves to themselves for the 5:30 p.m. kickoff. That will almost guarantee a better-than-average television audience, particularly for a nation used to having its Sunday afternoon football fix.
"With as many alums as we have around the country, we need to engage them as often as possible," said CU athletic director Mike Bohn. "One of the best ways to do that is to have our games on national television. This is one of those deals that made too much sense not to do."
Another plus for the two schools is that it's the Sunday afternoon of Labor Day weekend. There won't be issues of it being a school night, and folks who headed out of town for a couple of days will still have plenty of time to get home and catch an early evening game in Denver.
It could mean a larger television audience than normal, plus a few more tickets sold -- positives for both programs.
Then there's this: CU's season opener will also be the debut of one of the most touted recruits in the nation last winter, running back Darrell Scott.
What better platform for Scott to earn a little national cred immediately than the one that will be presented?
The switch also means that two of CU's first three games next fall will be televised. The home opener the following week (Sept. 6 vs. Eastern Washington) won't be on TV, but that will be followed by a Sept. 18 ESPN game at Folsom Field vs. West Virginia. That's a Thursday night tilt that again should offer some terrific national exposure for Dan Hawkins' Buffs.
As for folks looking ahead to 2009, CU currently has just five games scheduled at Folsom, with the CSU game site still to be determined.
While Colorado could play the game in Folsom -- CU has the option to play the game in Boulder in 2009 -- the fact that a game in Denver means about an extra $500,000 for CU is a factor that will almost certainly come into play.
"We'll hopefully come to a decision sometime early next fall," Bohn said. "That's something we're still studying."


Posted by LAbuffAlum on May 1, 2008 at 12:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
2009 seems like a no brainer we need the extra 500K
Posted by DCBuff on May 1, 2008 at 7:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree with LAbuffAlum. And in all fairness, CSU plays at Mile High when they are designated the "home team" and the Buffs should as well when we are designated the home team. Keep the game at Mile High!!
Posted by MDBuff on May 1, 2008 at 8:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Any chance for ESPN to pick it up?
Posted by LJBUFFS on May 1, 2008 at 11:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
picked up by FSN national. CSU is the home team so it's the MWC TV rights.
Posted by NorCalLovesDaBuffs on May 1, 2008 at 12:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The Darrel Scott hype already seems ridiculous. He is going to be a true freshman. This isn't basketball. If he has 40 yards rushing against CU, is he now a "bust"?
Posted by buffdaddy on May 1, 2008 at 12:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Forget the money, home games should be at Folsom. The Invesco games lack atmosphere. There is nothing better than seeing Ralphie run in the shadows of the Flatirons! Fight CU!!
Posted by CaliBuff on May 1, 2008 at 1:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Neutral Site games are good for alumni, money, exposure, the list goes on. Keep the Rocky Mountain Showdown in Denver. There is nothing like seeing buses pulled over on 36 to let students get a pee break on the way to the game. ha ha ha
Posted by smokey on May 1, 2008 at 3:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If it comes down to significant money, you can't argue with having the game at Mile Hi. But there's no denying that it's a much more sterile atmosphere. Plus, the closest seats at Mile Hi are about as close to the action as the concourse at Folsom. It sounds as though, perhaps, there's some wieght beind the rumors that the series may be cancelled in a few years? Anyone know anything about all that?
Posted by BigBuff on May 1, 2008 at 4:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree with the daddy. CU should play it's home games at home. Invesco sucks.
Posted by Ralphie2 on May 2, 2008 at 9:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
FIRED UP!
Posted by Dr_VinniGoombatz on May 8, 2008 at 8:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Ah yes the Lords day be damned; full speed ahead for the fame and $$$; not that Man’s God and I have been together for quite sometime now and really don’t care when the Buffs play as long as the decisions are those that work well for CU athletics in general.
BUT, let’s dispense with all this Ralphie squeeze, tell it like it is, and should be BTW. Bohn’s main concerns, and rightly so, are for the welfare of CU athletics; not for any Denver area PD. So let’s all agree that this day of rest nonsense is strictly concerned with policing efficiency for the gamers and not for any conventioneers that may be hanging around. The decision to move the game appears to be a sound one WRT the goals stated above so go for it.
Posted by Dr_VinniGoombatz on May 8, 2008 at 8:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
BTW, my main concern at this point is that Bohn get the above touted Sunday game on FREE TV down in Orlando Fla. so I don’t have to pay for it :-).
(Requires free registration.)
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.