Login | Member Center | Contact Us | Site Map | Alerts | Subscribe to the paper | DailyCamera.com

HomeFootball

Buffs' new offense follows trend toward hurrying it up

Up to half of Big 12 teams will use newer style

Colorado football coaches appear to be following the leader with their switch this spring to the hurry-up, no-huddle offense Missouri and Kansas used so effectively last season to produce the best results in the recent history of both programs.

The truth is coach Dan Hawkins and his assistants began talking about using such a scheme at Boulder's high altitude almost as soon as they were hired in December 2005 to replace the coaching staff led by Gary Barnett.

But when Hawkins and his staff first stepped on the field with their new team two years ago this spring, it quickly became obvious they didn't have the talent to pull it off.

So they waited, recruited and studied others. Over the past two seasons CU coaches have taken professional development trips to Oregon, Tulsa, Louisville, Air Force, Boise State, Minnesota and Clemson to study the wide-open approach to offense used in those programs.

Shortly after signing day in early February they decided it was finally time to make the switch to what seems to be the latest rage in the college game.

Oklahoma and Kansas State are said to be working on the hurry-up approach this spring, too. Oklahoma State is expanding what it already was doing last year, and the concept is obviously nothing new to the Tigers and Jayhawks.

That means at least half the teams in the Big 12 will be in a hurry when they have the ball in 2008.

"I think when you've got great athletes, it's a great offense," CU defensive coordinator Ron Collins said. "I think as we keep going, it's going to be a pretty powerful thing.

"It just really puts a stretch on the defense. I mean, the challenge is on. It's kind of an offensive explosion going on right now and you've got to be able to keep up with it. The great thing for us is we're practicing against it every day."

With NCAA officials and television executives seem-ingly devising new ways each year to shorten the game and draw down the average number of plays, coaches are counter-punching with a system that should increase the number of scoring chances.

The NCAA will likely approve rules changes for 2008 that include a 40-second play clock that starts at the end of the preceding play as well as changing the clock rules when a player runs out of bounds.

Under those situations, the clock will stop only long enough for the officials to mark the ball ready for play, and then it will start again. If a ball carrier goes out of bounds inside two minutes remaining in either half, the clock will stop until the ensuing snap, as it has in the past.

"We're not really doing too much different from a scheme standpoint," CU offensive coordinator Mark Helfrich said. "We're just trying to do it faster."

In the first two years under Hawkins, Helfrich and passing game coordinator Eric Kiesau, CU fans have grown accustomed to multiple players running on and off the field between plays.

CU coaches have been all about using different players to run specific plays. The new approach will require players to remain on the field regardless of the play call for the most part.

The no-huddle, hurry-up approach keeps a defense on its heels because it forces defenders and their coaches to commit to a particular defense quickly. The offensive coordinator and quarterback are then able to see what the defense is doing and take advantage by quickly changing the play or running what is called.

Helfrich said the offense takes a lot of pressure off his quarterbacks and even allows him to read the defense and make a quick change from the booth before the snap.

"I told these guys the other day. 'I'm sitting in a climate controlled booth, and it's a lot easier for me to sit there and help you out rather than trying to trigger that stuff,'" Helfrich said. "But we're going to put it in the guys' hands a lot, too. 'Cause we trust them. That's all give-and-take by game plan and certainly by quarterback."

Eventually defenses will refine their abilities to defend the offense more consistently and effectively and offensive coaches will have to come up with another new wrinkle. Collins said right now most defensive coordinators are doing their best to match up. Defending this spread-out and sped-up attack can be a nightmare.

"With the way the play clock is going right now, they've got a great chance to look our defense over and they can basically dictate what they want to run by what we're in," Collins said.

Comments

Posted by kimolukela on April 18, 2008 at 6:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I can't wait to see the spread offense. Let's go Buffs!

Posted by DCBuff on April 18, 2008 at 7:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I'm a big fan of this new offense as well!! It should also create more holes for Scott and Polk to run crazy all over opposing defenses and create more options in throwing situations downfield.

Posted by rodrigo on April 18, 2008 at 7:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Maybe I'm missing something but I don't think this constitutes a switch to the spread... It's just a no-huddle, hurry-up.

By week 3 last season Hawk wasn't fooling anyone with his play-specific platoons, but the team was young and really inexperienced. Now with more, better, and more-experienced talent, I think the hurry-up makes a ton of sense.

Posted by DCBuff on April 18, 2008 at 7:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree with you Rodrigo, but it looked like Hawk was running some sort of version of the spread offense at the scrimmage last week, with 3-4 wide outs on the field most of the time. But then again, that doesn't necessarily make it a "spread offense."

Posted by tallisall on April 18, 2008 at 7:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)

The defenses have already adapted to the hurry up. they just line up closer and then drop back or rush disguising coverage.

It also gives the other team more snaps because it cuts time of possession..

Hard on their own defense because of the top....

Posted by rodrigo on April 18, 2008 at 8:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)

DC, no doubt there are spread packages but - my opinion only - the Buffs will spread to compliment the running game and with the no-huddle, especially at altitude in Boulder, just bring Sumler/Lockridge/Moyd/Nabors/Polk/Scott/Stewart and try to wear people down as the games go on.

Tall, I don't know what you're smoking (4/20, anyone?) but I don't think too many defenses stopped Missouri or Kansas - or their short qbs - last year.

Posted by tallisall on April 18, 2008 at 9:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I'll concede Missouri, But Kansas is over rated, they played mostly high schools last season..

Kansas only scored 19 on CU and A&M...

Missouri was loaded with talent.

Posted by rodrigo on April 18, 2008 at 9:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Talent is the operative word. See my first post above. I know you'll pooh-pooh CU's talent in comparison to Mizzou's - heck, I'll be the first to concede the Buffs don't stack up well against the current Tigers.

But I like how it looks when measured against Kansas (I think you're more right then wrong there, too), KSU, Nebraska, Iowa State, Okla State, CSU, FSU, Eastern Wash and a depleted West Virginia d.

Posted by extrapoint on April 18, 2008 at 10:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)

something missing rod
We beat an OU team that beat a Hooker horn team that was better last year than it will be this year.
I cant wait to read the blogs on barkingcarnival.com after TX goes home a loser.

I like the hurry up as well, but the shotgun is more important. More detailed routes are possible by the wide receivers.

Doesnt look like Tall will make the spring game. He is still posting when he should have started hitchhiking days ago if he wants to get here from Omaha.

Posted by rodrigo on April 18, 2008 at 10:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)

smile.

Posted by mntbyker on April 18, 2008 at 11:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

LOL...multiple chuckles...Tall, can you stop by Cabellas and get me some of those lures you troll with when you come?

Posted by hershalsavage on April 18, 2008 at 2:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)

So, will Scott/Polk be gung ho about the switch to this style of offense? It seems similar to the spread, which by its nature is a pass oriented attack.

Posted by DCBuff on April 18, 2008 at 5:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)

hershalsavage - you are right that most spread offenses are pass oriented. But as Rodrigo points out, there are various versions of the spread package (just like there are many variations of the west coast offense). Hawkins has made it clear that he loves to pound the ball by running the ball and have a very balanced attack. I still see the buffs doing about 50/50 running and passing the ball.

Posted by extrapoint on April 18, 2008 at 10:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Urban Meyer's version is my favorite. Havent watched FL whole lot, but at Utah they used to run at you from all angles.

Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn: